Pepsico, Inc. (PEP). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: PepsiCo, Inc. is a major international producer of branded beverage and snack food products.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
PEP is trading at a premium to all four valuations above. Since PEP's tangible book value is not meaningful, a Graham number can not be calculated. The stock is trading at a 36.8% premium to its calculated fair value of $60.67. PEP did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
PEP earned two Stars in this section for 1.) and 3.) above. A Star was earned since the Free Cash Flow payout ratio was less than 60% and there were no negative Free Cash Flows over the last 10 years. PEP earned a Star for having an acceptable score in at least two of the four Key Metrics measured. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1952 and has increased its dividend payments for 41 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $479 is below the $500 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as PEP has. If PEP grows its dividend at 5.2% per year, it will take 1 years to equal a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 2.71%. PEP earned a check for the Key Metric 'Years to >MMA' since its 1 years is less than the 5 year target.
Memberships and Peers: PEP is a member of the S&P 500, a Dividend Aristocrat, a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index and a Dividend Champion. The company's peer group includes: The Coca-Cola Company (KO) with a 2.6% yield, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPS) with a 3.1% yield and Fomento Econ (FMX) with a 1.2% yield.
Conclusion: PEP did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned two Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of two Stars. This quantitatively ranks PEP as a 2-Star Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $81.80 before PEP's NPV MMA Differential decreased to the $500 minimum that I look for in a stock with 41 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 2.7%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $500 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 5.3%. This dividend growth rate is below the 5.2% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. PEP has a risk rating of 1.75 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
PEP enjoys relatively stable end markets, predictable cash flows and leading global market positions. The U.S. soft drink consumption improved in 2012 and should continue to improve in 2013. Long-term the company will have to focus on international markets for growth. The company's diverse portfolio can mitigate the impact of poor conditions in any one of its markets. PEP's direct store delivery system allows it to leverage its impressive portfolio of brands.
My concerns are PEP's debt as a percent of total capital and its valuation. Since I last reviewed PEP, debt as a percent of total capital is up one point to 57%, while free cash flow payout fell from 60% to a reasonable 49%. PEP is trading above my calculated fair value of $60.67, so for now, I will monitor the stock closely and wait before adding to my position.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in PEP (2.0% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- Nike, Inc. (NKE) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: [PEP] [KO] [DPS] [FMX]
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
Growth or yield? In a perfect world , income investors would want both from their investments and are not interested in investments that off...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of International Business Machines Corp. (IBM). Below are some highlights from the above li...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Phillips 66 (PSX). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company D...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles ...
Presented below are my dividend stock and ETF/CEF holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classified some of...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Apple Inc. (AAPL). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company D...
While the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats may be the most recognized list of dividend stocks, it is certainty not the largest. Since the D...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of AFLAC Incorporated (AFL). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Co...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Procter & Gamble (PG). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: C...
There is a reason that most mortgages are paid monthly and not quarterly. Banks are looking for reassurance the payments will continue to c...