Realty Income Corp. (O). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Realty Income Corporation is an equity real estate investment trust that owns commercial retail real estate properties in the United States.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
O is trading at a premium to all four valuations above. When also considering the NPV MMA Differential, the stock is trading at a 18.4% premium to its calculated fair value of $40.08. O did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
O earned one Star in this section for 3.) above, for having an acceptable score in at least two of the four Key Metrics measured. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1994 and has increased its dividend payments for 21 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $1,152 is below the $1,400 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as O has. The stock's current yield of 4.81% exceeds the 2.51% estimated 20-year average MMA rate.
Peers: The company's peer group includes: The DDR Corp. (DDR) with a 4.7% yield, National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) with a 5.1% yield and The Macerich Company (MAC) with a 3.4% yield.
Conclusion: O did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of one Star. This quantitatively ranks O as a 1-Star Very Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $43.53 before O's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $1,400 minimum that I look for in a stock with 21 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 5.2%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $1,400 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 3.3%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 2.4% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. O has a risk rating of 1.75 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
O follows a conservative strategy which has led to it being one of the best-positioned REITs with a capacity to make additional acquisitions. Its tenants sign long-term leases with regular rent bumps that allows O to provides a reliable, slow-growing, monthly dividend. The company is well-managed has delivered consistent growth over time. Its current strategy is to acquire well-located, freestanding single-tenant commercial properties with 10 to 20-year net lease agreements.
The company's debt to total capital of 47% (down from 49% in my last review) is slightly above my 45% maximum. Its free cash flow payout of -94% (previously -254%) is not sustainable over the long-term. The stock is currently trading at a 18.4% premium to my calculated fair value of $40.08. As such, I will not significantly add to my position at this time.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in O (2.4% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Dividend Stock Analysis
- United Technologies Corp. (UTX) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (OHI) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: O, DDR, NNN, MAC,
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
Throughout history there have always been great companies that stand head-and-shoulders above their peers and the competition. They are lov...
William P. Bengen is an author and a certified financial planner. In 1994 he published a study concluding that if retirees withdrew 4% ( the...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: ...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles ...
The key to successfully selecting dividend growth stocks is the ability to identify companies that will not only maintain but grow their di...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Raytheon Company (RTN). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Com...
D4L-Premium Services is designed to provide the busy dividend growth investor with a wealth of relevant information. Each week the D4L-Premi...
Presented below are are my Dividend Growth Stocks portfolio holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classifi...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: C...
If your goal is to accumulate wealth for a comfortable retirement , then there is no risk-free path. Yield and risk tend to follow each othe...