Realty Income Corp. (O). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Realty Income Corporation is an equity real estate investment trust that owns commercial retail real estate properties in the United States.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
O is trading at a premium to all four valuations above. The stock is trading at a 48.0% premium to its calculated fair value of $29.66. O did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
O earned one Star in this section for 3.) above. O earned a Star for having an acceptable score in at least two of the four Key Metrics measured. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1994 and has increased its dividend payments for 20 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $568 is below the $1,500 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as O has. The stock's current yield of 4.99% exceeds the 3.31% estimated 20-year average MMA rate.
Memberships and Peers: O is and a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index. The company's peer group includes: The DDR Corp. (DDR) with a 3.6% yield, National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) with a 4.6% yield and The Macerich Company (MAC) with a 3.8% yield.
Conclusion: O did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of one Star. This quantitatively ranks O as a 1-Star Very Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $30.82 before O's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $1,500 minimum that I look for in a stock with 20 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 7.1%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $1,500 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 4.3%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 0.5% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. O has a risk rating of 2.00 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
O follows a conservative strategy which has led to it being one of the best-positioned REITs with a capacity to make additional acquisitions. The company is well-manged has delivered consistent growth over time. Its current strategy to diversify into nonretail assets could add additional risk.
Recent strategic investments will enhance the company's properties quality. Also, a steady rental revenue going forward can be expected from a high proportion in investment grade tenants. The company's debt to total capital of 51% (up from 41% in my last review) is above my maximum. Its free cash flow payout of 80% (down from 81%) is well above my desired level. However, this is actually fairly conservative for a REIT sine they are required to payout 90% of their earnings as a dividends. The stock is currently trading at a 48.0% premium to my calculated fair value.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in O (2.5% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- Automatic Data Processing Inc. (ADP) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Raytheon Company (RTN) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- T. Rowe Price Group Inc. (TROW) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: [O] [DDR] [NNN] [MAC]
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
Over the last 12-18 months, there have been several prognosticators saying dividend stocks are extremely over valued. In many cases, I woul...
It is a well-documented fact that a significant portion of the historical equity returns are a result of reinvested dividends. In Triumph of...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of International Business Machines Corp. (IBM). Below are some highlights from the above li...
Each weekend I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Duke Energy (DUK). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company D...
As mentioned in previous articles, I love inspirational (and other) quotes . I see quotes as a portal to someone’s inner self. They reveal m...
In an utopian world, the perfect dividend stock would be one that is both high-yield and provide a high dividend growth rate. Its share pri...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of The Clorox Company (CLX). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Co...
Presented below are are my Dividend Growth Stocks portfolio holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classifi...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Apple Inc. (AAPL). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company D...