Pepsico, Inc. (PEP). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: PepsiCo, Inc. is a major international producer of branded beverage and snack food products.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
PEP is trading at a premium to all four valuations above. Since PEP's tangible book value is not meaningful, a Graham number can not be calculated. The stock is trading at a 41.5% premium to its calculated fair value of $60.67. PEP did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
PEP earned one Star in this section for 1.) above. A Star was earned since the Free Cash Flow payout ratio was less than 60% and there were no negative Free Cash Flows over the last 10 years. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1952 and has increased its dividend payments for 41 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $221 is below the $500 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as PEP has. If PEP grows its dividend at 5.2% per year, it will take 6 years to equal a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 3.41%.
Memberships and Peers: PEP is a member of the S&P 500, a Dividend Aristocrat, a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index and a Dividend Champion. The company's peer group includes: The Coca-Cola Company (KO) with a 2.8% yield, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPS) with a 3.2% yield and Fomento Econ (FMX) with a 1.7% yield.
Conclusion: PEP did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of one Star. This quantitatively ranks PEP as a 1-Star Very Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $71.10 before PEP's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $500 minimum that I look for in a stock with 41 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 2.6%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $500 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 7.0%. This dividend growth rate is above the 5.2% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. PEP has a risk rating of 1.75 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
PEP enjoys relatively stable end markets, predictable cash flows and leading global market positions. Long-term the company will have to focus on international markets for growth, with Frito-Lay's North America division driving profit growth in this region. The company's diverse portfolio can mitigate the impact of poor conditions in any one of its markets. PEP's direct store delivery system allows it to leverage its impressive portfolio of brands. Its focus on health and wellness should continue to drive sales.
My concerns are PEP's debt as a percent of total capital and its valuation. Since I last reviewed PEP, debt as a percent of total capital is unchanged at 57%, while free cash flow payout fell from 49% to 48%. PEP is trading above my calculated fair value of $60.67, so for now, I will monitor the stock closely and wait before adding to my position.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in PEP (1.9% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- Nike, Inc. (NKE) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Genuine Parts Company (GPC) Dividend Stock Analysis
- International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: [PEP] [KO] [DPS] [FMX]
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
It seems the older I get the more I fight with my weight. I know how to lose weight - I have done it several times. The formula is not diffi...
The main focus of investing in dividend growth stocks is finding and buying stocks that will continue to raise their dividends in the future...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: ...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles ...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Duke Energy (DUK). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company D...
Presented below are are my Dividend Growth Stocks portfolio holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classifi...
Most people aren't very good at investing. I suspect over their lifetimes, most investors will end up losing money in the stock market ....
As investors in Dividend Growth Stocks , we want to limit our purchases to only the very best stocks. Our first step is to look at published...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Kimberly-Clark Co. (KMB). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Co...