Linked here is a PDF copy of my detailed analysis of The Coca-Cola Company (KO) (alt.1, alt.2). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: The Coca-Cola Company engages in the manufacture, distribution, and marketing of nonalcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups worldwide.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1.) Avg. High Yield Price, 2.) 20-Year DCF Price, 3.) Avg. P/E Price and 4.) Graham Number. KO is trading to at a premium to all four valuations listed above. If I exclude the high and low valuation, and average the remaining two valuations, KO is trading at a 65.1% premium. A Star is deducted due to the high premium.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1.) Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%, 2.) Dividend Growth Rate, 3.) Years of Div. Growth, 4.) 1-Yr. > 5-Yr Growth and 5.) Payout 15% of avg. KO only earned one Star in this section for 3.) above - it has grown dividends for at least 10 years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA)? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1.) NPV MMA Diff. and 2.) Years to >MMA. KO did not earn any Stars in this section. In fact it had a Star deducted since the NPV of MMA Dif. is negative. That means for every $1,000 invested KO will earn $1,919 less than a MMA earning 5.11%.
Other: KO is a member of the S&P 500, is an Aristocrat and an Achiever. In addition, Berkshire-Hathaway (Warren Buffet's company) has long-held a significant stake in KO.
Conclusion: KO lost a Star in the Fair Value section, picked up one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section and was deducted another Star in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of negative 1 Stars, one less than my scale allows, which rates it as a 0-Star Avoid stock. Sometimes Avoid means Avoid, and this is one of those times. I suspect there is a reason Buffett is no longer buying KO, and I won't be either until something changes.
Disclaimer: As always this is only my opinion and you should not rely on it. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I own shares of KO.
What are your thoughts on KO?
Recent Stock Analyses:
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
Presented below are my dividend stock and ETF/CEF holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classified some of...
Every investor wants to earn more. It is how we define "more" and how we go about earning it that defines the type of investor we ...
In every field there are winners and there are champions. The difference is subtle, but very real. A champion is driven for success and will...
In 1993, State Street Global Advisors launched the first exchange-traded fund (ETF). Now there are literally hundreds of ETFs out there cove...
Once again it is time for a goals/progress update. I am pleased to report that annualized dividend income increased in January, extending t...
In the U.S. and Canada, most companies pay dividends quarterly . In other parts of the world, it is not uncommon for companies to pay an ann...
Monday, October 31, 2011 will mark my fourth full year of writing as Dividends4Life . It is hard to believe another year has passed. Like th...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Below are some highlights from the above linked analys...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week, along with any Carnivals I participated in. For those re...
Like many that came before me, I am on a journey to construct a portfolio that will provide me... Dividends 4 Life