Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Wells Fargo & Company, with assets of nearly $1.72 trillion, is the fourth largest in the U.S. It provides banking, insurance, investment, mortgage and consumer finance services.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
WFC is trading at a discount to only 1.) above. When also considering the NPV MMA Differential, the stock is trading at a 97.8% premium to its calculated fair value of $26.02. WFC did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
WFC earned no Stars in this section. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1939 and has increased its dividend payments for 5 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $161 is below the $3,000 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as WFC has. If WFC grows its dividend at 2.1% per year, it will take 1 years to equal a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 2.92%. WFC earned a check for the Key Metric 'Years to >MMA' since its 1 years is less than the 5 year target.
Peers: The company’s peer group includes: Citigroup Inc. (C) with a 0.4% yield, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) with a 1.3% yield and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) with a 2.9% yield.
Conclusion: WFC did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of zero Star. This quantitatively ranks WFC as a 0-Star Avoid stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $19.21 before WFC's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $3,000 minimum that I look for in a stock with 5 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 7.8%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $500 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 11.7%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 2.1% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. WFC has a risk rating of 2.25 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
According to S&P, "If and when long-term interest rates rise along with an improving U.S. economy, and loan growth accelerates, WFC is well-positioned to grow net interest income at a faster pace than in any of the five previous years. WFC's loan growth generally is faster than peers, but persistent net interest margin compression, due to WFC's larger base of deposits, has held back growth of net interest income." WFC is trading well above my calculated fair value price of $26.02, its debt to total capital is above my maximum. For now, I will wait for a more opportune time before initiating a position.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was held no position in WFC (0.0% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- ConocoPhillips Co. (COP) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Helmerich & Payne Inc. (HP) Dividend Stock Analysis
- AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Phillips 66 (PSX) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: WFC, C, BAC JPM,
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
I know very little about hockey, but I have always loved this quote: I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been. &quo...
Any income investor will tell you that it is important for a company to sustain its dividend . However, as an investor in dividend growth st...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (OHI). Below are some highlights from the above linked ...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of United Technologies Corp. (UTX). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysi...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles ...
Presented below are are my Dividend Growth Stocks portfolio holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classifi...
Monday, October 31, 2011 will mark my fourth full year of writing as Dividends4Life . It is hard to believe another year has passed. Like th...
Like many that came before me, I am on a journey to construct a portfolio that will provide me... Dividends 4 Life
Has someone near and dear to you responded with a 'I was only trying to help' after royally messing something up? Have you ever tink...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Target Corporation (TGT). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Co...