Thursday, January 2, 2014
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Dividend Stock Analysis
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Cisco Systems, Inc. offers a complete line of routers and switching products that connect and manage communications among local and wide area computer networks employing a variety of protocols.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
CSCO is trading at a discount to 1.) and 3.) above. The stock is trading at a slight premium to its calculated fair value of $21.. CSCO did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
CSCO earned two Stars in this section for 1.) and 2.) above. A Star was earned since the Free Cash Flow payout ratio was less than 60% and there were no negative Free Cash Flows over the last 10 years. The stock earned a Star as a result of its most recent Debt to Total Capital being less than 45%. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 2011 and has increased its dividend payments for 4 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The NPV MMA Diff. of the $1,779 is below the $3,100 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as CSCO has. If CSCO grows its dividend at 9.7% per year, it will take 2 years to equal a MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 3.41%. CSCO earned a check for the Key Metric 'Years to >MMA' since its 2 years is less than the 5 year target.
Memberships and Peers: CSCO is a member of the S&P 500. The company’s peer group includes: Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (BRCD) with a 0.0% yield, Juniper Networks, Inc. (JNPR) with a 0.0% yield, and Sonus Networks, Inc. (SONS) with a 0.0% yield.
Conclusion: CSCO did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned two Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of two Stars. This quantitatively ranks CSCO as a 2-Star Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $17.68 before CSCO's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $3,100 minimum that I look for in a stock with 4 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 3.8%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $3,100 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 11.7%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 9.7% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. CSCO has a risk rating of 1.50 which classifies it as a Low risk stock.
CSCO competes in a highly competitive industry. As demand in emerging markets has declined sharply, CSCO has felt the pinch. However, the company has not stood still during this challenging time. It has become leaner and is now a more focused competitor. Scale advantages and significant customer switching costs provide CSCO competitive advantages in its core markets. We believe the company's focus on total solutions will help return it to growth during 2014. I will continue to look for opportunities to add to my position when the stock is trading near my calculated fair value of $21.00.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in CSCO (0.5% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
- Darden Restaurant Inc. (DRI) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Meredith Corp. (MDP) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Target Corporation (TGT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- More Stock Analysis
Tags: [CSCO] [BRCD] [JNPR] [SONS]
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
The difference between an income investor and a dividend growth investor is time and the understanding of how compound growth works. If you...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysi...
Each Sunday I highlight any notable articles that I came across over the past week. Though I may not always agree with each of the articles ...
Most casual income investors focus on current yield, which is important. However, if your objective as an income investor is to build a port...
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Below are some highlights from the above linked analys...
Presented below are my dividend stock and ETF/CEF holdings. This is not a recommendation to buy these securities. I have classified some of...
Monday, October 31, 2011 will mark my fourth full year of writing as Dividends4Life . It is hard to believe another year has passed. Like th...
Like many that came before me, I am on a journey to construct a portfolio that will provide me... Dividends 4 Life
How much money will you need for retirement ? This a very difficult question to answer. There are many factors and assumptions that go into ...
This is a guest post by Jeremy J. McNeil. Many of you may remember Jeremy as the original Dividend Guy. He was also one of the founding mem...