Pages

Saturday, February 21, 2009

* My Holdings As A % Of Market Value And Income

As part of my full disclosure on stock analyses, I include the subject stock's percentage of my income portfolio (market basis) for securities I own. This prompted one reader to ask if I would disclose the percentage of each of my holdings. Below is a table of my income holdings and their relative percentages based on market value and annual income generated:

Mk Val. Income
AFL 1.3% 1.0%
BBT 1.9% 3.1%
BP 2.9% 3.0%
CAT 0.9% 0.7%
CLX 1.4% 0.6%
CVX 1.3% 0.6%
CNI 2.2% 0.6%
CTL 2.1% 2.9%
ED 6.3% 4.9%
GE 1.7% 2.7%
HCP 2.2% 2.7%
HD 1.6% 0.9%
INTC 1.0% 0.6%
ITW 3.5% 1.7%
JNJ 2.5% 1.0%
KMB 1.3% 0.8%
KO 1.3% 0.6%
LLY 2.4% 1.6%
MCD 2.7% 1.2%
MFC 1.4% 1.3%
MTB 0.5% 0.5%
NNN 5.8% 7.8%
NUE 1.5% 0.7%
O 4.0% 5.0%
PAYX 1.6% 1.8%
PEP 2.2% 0.9%
PG 2.3% 0.9%
PGN 3.7% 3.1%
RY 1.9% 1.7%
SYY 4.0% 2.1%
TEG 1.2% 1.0%
USB 0.6% 1.2%
UTX 1.4% 0.6%
WMT 1.5% 0.4%
SDY 3.6% 3.1%
AOD 3.4% 14.9%
BLV 2.6% 1.8%
ETO 4.6% 10.4%
PID 1.9% 1.2%
VFH 1.4% 1.4%
VIG 3.1% 1.1%
VNQ 2.2% 3.4%
VYM 3.3% 2.4%
The red highlighted items are securities that are outside of my 5% maximum allocation. In the case of market value, ED and NNN are long-term holdings that "grew" into the overallocation position (actually declined less than the other securities). As for the income percentages, this is something that I just recently started to monitor. ETO and AOD are unacceptable at their current levels. I am gradually working these percentages down via sales. NNN is close enough that it will come inline as I add new investments.

Be careful not to read too much into this table. These are not recommended allocations, instead it is just a snapshot of where I am currently at after many years of investing.